Monday, 9 March 2009

Fatter but fitter?!




I'm trialling a new feature today. As you can see above, I'm going to try putting each day's training stats - as downloaded from my Garmin Edge 705 - at the top of the day's blog entry. I just think that, frankly, it's the most interesting bit, and it's the bit I'd want to click on if I was reading somebody else's training blog.

I also have an ulterior motive, because I'm hoping it'll deflect attention from the other stats that I'm going to put in today's blog entry. Every Monday,
I'm going to try and record my weight, body fat percentage, muscle mass etc - that I've got from my Tanita Innerscan body composition scales - in an effort to track the changes. The thing is, I was kinda hoping that my weight and body fat percentage would magically decrease, thereby making me seem like a much more worthwhile person (oops, I think I must have been reading too much 'Heat' magazine again). Unfortunately, that hasn't quite proved to be the case - at least not in this first week. Anyway, without further ado, here's the newly-christened "Tale of the Tanita".

Weight: 11 stone 11 pounds
Body Fat Percentage: 19.8%
Body Water Percentage: 55.5%
Muscle Mass: 8 stone 14 pounds
Basal Metabolic Rate: 7300kJ/1745kcal
Visceral Fat Rating: 7

Basically, all of those seem to be a bit worse than last week's readings, which is disappointing to say the least. My body fat percentage in particular is starting to look a bit worrying, but I'm not entirely sure what I can do about it, because I eat pretty healthily anyway and don't really like a lot of fatty stuff anyway.

Inspired (or depressed..kinda depends how you look at it..I'm gonna go with inspired for now) by this, I've booked myself to have a full physiological assessment at Sportstest. This is a company run by Dr Garry Palmer, who co-wrote Elite Performance: Cycling: Succesful Sportives, which I raved about yesterday. As I said, I was very impressed by the detailed, but clear way in which the book goes into the science of training for Sportives and as I was looking to get a detailed
assessment anyway, I thought I'd look them up. It turns out that although they're based in the Midlands, they also do testing in Hampton, which is just round the corner from me. So, to cut a long story short, I'm booked in for 1 o'clock next Thursday.

They promise assessment of peak power output. VO2 max, power to weight ratio, maximum heart rate, endurance capacity and threshold determination. The key thing is that these figures aren't just to show off to your friends (and frankly I know I'm not going to have anything to show off about anyway), but from your maximum heart rate and your training thresholds, you can accurately work out your individual heart rate training zones, enabling you to train "smarter" as they say. Just to clarify, I would NEVER say that.

It's starting to feel like with all my cycling-related expenditure at the moment, I'm single-handedly administering a fiscal stimulus to the British economy, but I figure it really is a once in a lifetime experience and I want to get to the start line knowing I've done everything I can to be fit enough to finish the etape.

As far as today's actual training goes, I was out all day in town, so my only real opportunity was more work on the turbo tonight. I wanted to push myself a little bit harder today, so I thought I'd have a crack at riding at "Conditioning" volume. This is riding at a level where you have "difficulty" holding a conversation for long periods - a heart rate of 145-155 bpm. I thought I'd just see how I felt on the bike once I got going to determine how long I cycled for, and I ended up doing an hour. I'm just looking at my training sheet now, and it turns out that's the time recommended for "Advanced" cyclists, which I'm pleased about - although slightly concerned that I might have pushed it too far.

Actually, I'm not that concerned, because I felt good on the bike - and my legs again weren't particularly fatigued. I settled on a gear that gave me an equilibrium between my Heart Rate and pedalling Cadence - 150 and 80 respectively. Again, the slight limiting factor was a bit of saddle soreness - you can see this on the training stats where I had to hop off the bike for 20 seconds or so, to readjust my shorts - but there was definitely less soreness than yesterday, and I felt much more comfortable with the riding position.

'Cycling Successful Sportives' recommended loading up with carbs for this activity, as a lot of carbohydrate is apparently used at this intensity. Taking this to heart, I filled one of my water bottles with Science in Sport's PSP22 drink, and one of my bottles with their Go Electrolyte. It's
difficult to tell how much of an effect this had, because obviously I don't know how I would have felt if I hadn't taken them. However, I definitely felt much more comfortable at this intensity than I would have expected, so that's got to be a good thing. As a footnote, I also had a bottle of Sis's Rego afterwards. Chocolate flavour today, which had a slightly malty flavour, but I still preferred it to the Strawberry. I'm running out of the drinks from my SiS starter pack, so hopefully my order from Wiggle will arrive tomorrow. Molly's looking forward to that as she's hoping it'll give her more opportunities to build up her part.

I'm going to try and finally get out on the road tomorrow, so maybe I'll try some of the bars and gels on that ride and see what they're like. The weather's forecast to be 'mixed' and a bit rainy, but I think I should get out anyway. I've got a rest day planned for Wednesday, so I need to do something to have deserved it.

No comments:

Post a Comment